Skip to main content

Correction to: Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

The Original Article was published on 10 December 2020

Correction to: J Patient Rep Outcomes 4, 106 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0

After publication of the original article [1], the authors notified some errors in Table 6 and in the Appendix 2:

Table 6 has errors in 2 parameters:

  • For the cell that corresponds to “Pain Intensity (PRO-CTCAE)” and “SL A”, the correct number is 1.58 rather than 1.20;

  • For the very next cell on the right that corresponds to “Pain Intensity (PRO-CTCAE)” and “SL B”, the correct number is − 0.26 rather than − 1.04.

Table 6 Item parameters of the non-PROMIS items after Stocking-Lord linking

In Appendix 2, p. 12 shows old Pain Intensity item parameters; the correct parameters are below shown:

The newer one (correct one) shows

figurea

Furthermore the authors identified an error in the author name of Amylou C. Dueck. The incorrect author name is: Amy C. Dueck; The correct author name is: Amylou C. Dueck.

In the Results section, ‘’98.8%’’ should be replaced with ‘’71.2%’’ in the sentence “Breast cancer, lymphoma/myeloma, colorectal cancer, head/neck/gastroesophageal cancer, and lung cancer made up 98.8% of the patients”.

In the Linkage results section, ‘‘50-80’’ should be replaced with ‘‘60-80”,in the sentence “For all domains except pain intensity, the expected raw score values differed by less than |0.5| point across thetas. For pain intensity, in a higher T-score range of about 50–80, the difference in NRS score was larger than |0.5|’’.

The original article [1] has been corrected.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Lee, et al. (2020). Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4, 106 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minji K. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, M.K., Schalet, B.D., Cella, D. et al. Correction to: Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Patient Rep Outcomes 5, 20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00280-z

Download citation

\