RAPA version | Version 0.1 | Version 0.1 | Version 0.1 | Version 0.2 | Version 0.2 | Version 0.2 | Version 0.3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interview number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Participant characteristics | Female, age 59 years General population RAPA activity level: active RAPA Score: 6 | Female, age 66 years General population RAPA activity level: active RAPA Score: 6 | Male, age 60 years General population RAPA activity level: active RAPA Score: 7 | Female, age 55 years Orthopedic rehabilitation RAPA activity level: active RAPA score: 10 | Male, age 65 years Cardiac rehabilitation RAPA activity level: active RAPA score: 10 | Male, age 69 years Cardiac rehabilitation RAPA activity level: under-active regular – light activities RAPA score: 3 | Male, age 66 years Cardiac patient RAPA activity level: active RAPA score: 10 |
Time to complete the RAPA questionnaire | 2 min 20 s | 2 min | 1 min 45 s | 2 min 20 s | 1 min 30 s | 2 min | 5 min |
Design (layout, font size, spacing on the page) | Design is appropriate | Design is clear and fits well | Design is appropriate | Design is appropriate | Design is clear and it is easy to read (font size) | Design is appropriate | Appropriate |
Offensive or questionable content | None, all questions are worded politely | None | None | None | None | None | None |
Explanation of physical activity and intensity | Sometimes the examples may not be suitable, for example strength training as well as aerobics class can also be vigorous activities, because the content is not clearly defined | Understandable | The participant found the categories do not apply to his physical activity, because he is regularly doing hard construction work, so it was difficult for him to select the correct answer; maybe the intensity categories and example activities are not suitable for a hard-working person | Understandable, easy to read, even without glasses | Understandable, appropriate graphics | The given examples were easy to understand and graphics were helpful | Helpful to understand levels of exertion in relation to heart rate; the examples could include an image of gardening, which could be a moderate intensity activity; questions the image of an old man for ‘walking at a slow pace’ |
Wording of the questions | Time specifications in items 4, 5 and 6 are incomprehensible; she had to read these items repeatedly to understand their meaning | Content is meaningful but items 4 and 5 caused some confusion | Content is meaningful and easy to understand | Items 4 and 5 are difficult to grasp, but overall, the content is meaningful | Content is meaningful and easy to go through | Content for items 1–3 is meaningful and easy to understand; items 4–5 were too long and harder to understand (but not impossible); items 6–7 and the items on strength and flexibility were easy to understand | Answered items 4 and 5 incorrectly upon first completion, had to read repeatedly to understand the meaning; suggests to split items 4 and 5 into two items each, asking about each level of activity separately |
Response options | Yes and no answer options are appropriate in relation to the questions | Sometimes difficult to choose between yes and no, but then considered for herself whether it is more likely to be yes or no and ticked accordingly; in general, she prefers to define answers herself | Yes and no answer options are appropriate in relation to the questions | Yes and no answer options are appropriate in relation to the questions | Yes and no answer options are appropriate in relation to the questions | Yes and no answer options are appropriate in relation to the questions | Clear, able to relate all response options to himself |
RAPA version | Version 0.3 | Version 0.4 | Version 0.4 | Version 0.4 | Version 0.4 | Version 0.4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interview number | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
Participant characteristics | Female, age 71 years General population RAPA activity level: active RAPA Score: 10 | Female, 73 years General population RAPA activity level: active RAPA score: 6 | Male, 78 years old Neurologic patient RAPA activity level: under-active regular RAPA score: 8 | Male, age 56 years Cardiac rehabilitation RAPA activity level: active RAPA score: 6 | Male, age 56 years Post-COVID-19 rehabilitation RAPA activity level: active RAPA score: 6 | Male, age 73 years Cardiac patient RAPA activity level: under-active RAPA score: 2 |
Time to complete the RAPA questionnaire | 5 min 20 s | 2 min 10 s | 5 min 30 s | 2 min 30 s | 2 min 30 s | 4 min 20 s |
Design (layout, font size, spacing on the page) | Good font size, appropriate layout | Appropriate | Good | Good | Good | Good, font size appropriate for older people |
Offensive or questionable content | None | None | None | None | None | None |
Explanation of physical activity and intensity | Understandable, but also the level of exertion experienced with any of the example activities depends on the individual; yoga can be moderate exertion for some, aerobics class can be a vigorous activity for some, etc | Appropriate, understandable | Appropriate | Clear | Clear | Cutting wood, which he does regularly, is also a strenuous activity; the level of effort/intensity also depends on the individual |
Wording of the questions | Items 4 and 5 are very confusing; had to read these repeatedly and did not grasp the 2 alternatives within each item | Overall clear, some items require reading twice (specifically 4 and 5) | Clear and make sense; needed to read some items twice, but able to relate to own physical activity | Somewhat confusing, needed to read repeatedly, especially those questions which include two options; but understandable after repeated reading | Initially confusing, needed to read through all questions to understand the logic; but then understandable and able to relate to own physical activity | Had to read through some questions repeatedly to be clear on differences in days/minutes between questions; overall understandable and able to relate to own physical activity |
Response options | Appropriate, and for those items where the question wording is clear the answer options make sense | Make sense, although could also offer a 5-point rating | Make sense, but could also be formulated as 5-point rating | Clear and make sense | Appropriate | Appropriate |