Skip to main content

Table 2 Caregiver feedback on YC-PEM content modifications

From: Diversified caregiver input to upgrade the Young Children’s Participation and Environment Measure for equitable pediatric re/habilitation practice

Proposed modification

Rationale

Codes

   

Participation assessment

   

Yes, be more interactive rephrased as Yes, interact more

Upgrades to participation assessment further clarifies that changing participation is not about changing the child to ‘be more’; rather, changing participation is about creating opportunities for the child to get more involved in the type of activity

No, was not stuck

Yes, was stuck

   

Yes, be more helpful rephrased as Yes, help more

     

Environmental assessment

Proposed modification

Rationale

Codes

Clarify items

Remove or simplify terms

Add item examples

Understanding environmental content modifications

Home

The attitudes and actions of babysitters, therapists, and other professionals who care for your child at home (e.g., microaggressive/

allyship behaviors)

Community

The attitudes and actions of other members of the community towards your child (e.g., microaggressive/allyship behavior of staff at stores and restaurants, instructors, coaches, childcare provider, other families)

Upgrades to environmental assessment include anti-racist terms (e.g., microaggressions, implicit bias) in the item examples, caregivers may be inclined to consider, report, and share their expertise about issues of this type

Home

Lack of comprehension

Community

Confusion with location and job roles

Home

Anti-racist terms may not be needed

Assumed education level

Include full question

Community

Anti-racist terms may be unnecessary or triggering

Learning opportunity

Use of simple words

Home

Allyship example

Microaggression example

More descriptive example

Community

Microaggression example

Home

All services are virtual

Anti-racist term description

Child’s interactions with individuals

Monitoring who comes in the house

Community

Caregiver judged based on child’s behavior

No one that looks like the child

Positive community interactions support participation

Strangers in the community

Community

Your child’s relationships with peers (e.g., neighbor)

N/A

Community

Neighbor may not be needed

Community

Expand or specific examples to clarify neighbor

Community

Building social skills

Difference in peer intimacy levels

Home

Policies (e.g., inclusive/discriminatory policies pertaining to a residence or workplace, such as family leave or working from home, time off, work hours)

Community

Policies (e.g., inclusive/discriminatory policies by neighborhood, childcare, or employer)

Home

Lack of comprehension

Community

Confusion over neighborhood policy

Understands but can’t explain

Home

Assumed health literacy

Parenting policies

Community

Referring back to previous policy questions

Home

More descriptive examples

Community

Specific neighborhood examples

Home

Residence policies

Work flexibility and acknowledgement of caregiver priorities

Community

Challenging childcare policies and procedures

Safe and inclusive communities

Securing and sustaining employment