Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics

From: Health status analysis is comparable in HM3 patients with different preoperative grades of mitral regurgitation

 

Total

(n = 45)

Not severe MR

(n = 33)

Severe MR

(n = 12)

p value

Age at implantation [yrs]

59.1 ± 10.7

58.2 ± 10.8

61.7 ± 10.5

0.35

Sex, male

42 (93.3%)

30 (93.3%)

12 (100.0%)

0.69

Valve surgery

 AVR during LVAD

5 (11.1%)

3 (9.1%)

2 (16.7%)

0.86

 TVR during LVAD

1 (2.2%)

1 (3.0%)

0 (0%)

1

Etiology

   

1

 NICM

22 (48.9%)

16 (48.5%)

6 (50.0%)

 

 ICM

23 (51.1%)

17 (51.5%)

6 (50.0%)

 

Implant strategy

   

0.25

 BTT

14 (31.1%)

10 (30.3%)

4 (33.3%)

 

 DT

14 (31.1%)

8 (24.2%)

6 (50.0%)

 

 BTD

14 (31.1%)

12 (36.4%)

2 (16.7%)

 

 BTR

3 (1.4%)

3 (9.1%)

0 (0%)

 

INTERMACS profile

   

0.88

 1

7 (15.6%)

5 (15.2%)

2 (16.7%)

 

 2

11 (24.4%)

8 (24.2%)

3 (25.0%)

 

 3

20 (44.4%)

14 (42.4%)

6 (50.0%)

 

 4–7

7 (15.6%)

6 (18.2%)

1 (8.3%)

 

Pre-LVAD 6 MWT [m]

301.8 ± 95.7

306.3 ± 85.0

293.3 ± 117.7

0.72

  1. AVR aortic valve replacement or reconstruction, BTD bridge to decision, BTR bridge to recovery, BTT bridge to transplant, DT destination therapy, ICM ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVAD left ventricular assist device, INTERMACS interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support, MR mitral regurgitation, MVR mitral valve reconstruction, NICM non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, TVR tricuspidal valve replacement, yrs years, 6 MWT 6-min walk test