Skip to main content

Table 5 Within-individual change estimates from distribution-based methods for TSQM v1.4, HADS, PDDS and HRPQ-MS v2 scores

From: Establishing clinically meaningful within-individual improvement thresholds for eight patient-reported outcome measures in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Score

SDBL

0.5 SDBL

SEMa

Min detectable change

Recommended valueb

Multi-item scores

TSQM v1.4

 Side effects

28.64

14.32

6.83

18.94

14.32

 Effectiveness

19.98

9.99

5.73

15.89

9.99

 Convenience

21.62

10.81

5.59

15.48

10.81

 Global satisfaction

24.49

12.24

7.72

21.41

12.24

HADS

 Anxiety

4.35

2.18

1.59

4.39

2.18

 Depression

4.02

2.01

1.58

4.39

2.01

Single-item scores

PDDS

 –

1.98

0.99

0.99

HRPQ-MS v2

 Lost work absenteeism household

3.77

1.88

1.88

 Lost work absenteeism workplace

5.35

2.67

2.67

 Lost work presenteeism household

4.07

2.03

2.03

 Lost work presenteeism workplace

5.03

2.51

2.51

 Lost work total household

6.45

3.22

3.22

 Lost work total workplace

7.90

3.95

3.95

 Percent lost work absenteeism household

29.40

14.70

14.70

 Percent lost work absenteeism workplace

16.54

8.27

8.27

 Percent lost work presenteeism household

22.73

11.36

11.36

 Percent lost work presenteeism workplace

14.68

7.34

7.34

 Percent lost work total household

38.33

19.17

19.17

 Percent lost work total workplace

23.13

11.57

11.57

 Work presenteeism household

8.51

4.26

4.26

 Work presenteeism workplace

13.83

6.92

6.92

  1. aSEM based on Cronbach’s alpha calculated at baseline. bThe recommended value for meaningful within-individual change was defined by 0.5SD at baseline
  2. HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HRPQ-MS v2 Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis version 2; PDDS Patient-Determined Disease Steps; SDBL Standard deviation at baseline; SEM Standard error of measurement; TSQM v1.4 Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire with Medication version 1.4