Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Effectiveness of routine provision of feedback from patient‐reported outcome measurements for cancer care improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Population

Design

Participants

Outcome measures

N

Age (mean & SD)

Sex (female %)

Absolom [23]

UK

Adult patients initiating chemotherapy for colorectal, breast, or gynecological cancers

Two-arm parallel RCT

Txt: 256

Ctrl: 252

Txt: 55.9 (12.2)

Ctrl: 56.0 (11.3)

Txt: 80.1%

Ctrl: 79.8%

FACT-PWB, Hospital services and cost-effectiveness using EHR data, Self-Efficacy Scale for managing chronic disease questionnaire, EQ-5D-5, EQ-5D-VAS, QLU-C10D, FACT-G, EORTC QLQ-C30

Anderson [24]

USA

Low-income African American and Latina breast cancer patients

RCT

Txt: 31

Ctrl: 29

Txt: 49.6 (9.9)

Ctrl: 50.5 (11.0)

Txt: 100%

Ctrl: 100%

MDASI, BQ-II, Pain management index

Basch [25]

USA

Adult patients initiating chemotherapy

RCT

Txt: 441

Ctrl: 325

All: median: 61 (26 – 91)

All: 58%

EuroQol EQ-5D Index, 1-year OS, number of ED visits

Bryant [26]

USA

Oncology adult patients scheduled inpatient care following bone marrow transplant

RCT

Txt: 38

Ctrl: 38

Txt: 51.3 (13.6)

Ctrl: 51.1 (13.7)

Txt: 78.9%

Ctrl: 68.4%

PRO-CTCAE survey, HCT-CI

Cleeland [27]

USA

Adult patients receiving thoracotomy for lung cancer or lung metastasis

RCT

Txt: 50

Ctrl: 50

Txt: 59.2 (13.6)

Ctrl: 60.9 (11.8)

Txt: 44.7%

Ctrl: 48.8%

MDASI, satisfaction with postoperative symptom control

Denis [28]

France

Adult patients with advanced lung cancer

Multi-center RCT

Txt: 66

Ctrl: 67

Median (range)

Txt: 65 (36 – 87)

Ctrl: 64 (43 – 88)

Txt: 31.7%

Ctrl: 34.4%

OS, PFS, FACT-L, number of unscheduled visits

Detmar [29]

The Netherlands

Adult patients receiving palliative chemotherapy

Cluster RCT

Txt: 114

Ctrl: 200

Txt: 58 (NR)

Txt: 55 (NR)

Txt: 73%

Ctrl: 81%

COOP, WONCA, 5-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, SF-36

Fann [30]

USA

Adult patients initiating cancer therapy

RCT

Txt: 289

Ctrl: 292

Median (range)

Txt: 56 (33–86)

Ctrl: 59 (19–88)

Txt: 50%

Ctrl: 46%

PHQ-9, QLQ-C30

Girgis [31]

Australia

Adult patients with nonlocalized breast or colorectal cancer within 6 months of diagnosis

RCT

Txt 1: 119

Txt 2: 120

Ctrl: 117

Txt 1: 58.3

Txt 2: 57.8

Ctrl: 57.4

Txt 1: 72.3%

Txt 2: 72.5%

Ctrl: 71.8

HADS, EORCT, 34-item Supportive Needs Survey – Short Form, 10 items from the Needs Assessment for Advanced Cancer Patient Questionnaire, One question for perceived improvement in patient-physician communication

Hoekstra [32]

The Netherlands

Adult patients with cancer in the palliative phase

Cluster RCT

Txt: 69

Ctrl: 77

Txt: 64.1 (NR)

Ctrl: 64.6 (NR)

Txt: 53.6%

Ctrl: 58.4%

Symptom Monitor (assessing 10 symptoms) self-report instrument

Kornblith [33]

USA

Older adult patients with advanced breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers

RCT

Txt: 69

Ctrl: 62

Txt: 73 (5.7)

Ctrl: 74 (6.8)

Txt: 48%

Ctrl: 47%

EORTC QLQ-30, GDS short form, HADS, MOS Social Support Survey, the Older American Resources and Services Questionnaire Physical Health subscale

Kuo [34]

Canada

Adult patients with incurable NSCLC

RCT

Txt: 33

Ctrl: 51

Median (range)

Txt: 63 (43 – 80)

Ctrl: 67 (39 – 80)

Txt: 43%

Ctrl: 45%

Palliative referral rate, number of first-line chemotherapy cycles administered, referral to and use of other supportive interventions, changes in HRQL

Lugtenberg [48]

The Netherlands

Adult patients with early-stage breast cancer (stage I-III) receiving chemotherapy

RCT

Txt: 60

Ctrl: 53

Txt: 51 (10.9)

Ctrl: 52.1 (9.6)

Txt: 100%

Ctrl: 100%

EORTC-QLQ C30, BIPQ, PEPPI, MCQ-C, NCCD DT, HADS

McLachlan [35]

Australia

Adult oncology patients from ambulatory clinics

RCT

Txt: 296

Ctrl: 154

Median (range)

61 (18–92)

49%

Changes in CNQ, EORTC QLQ-C30, and BDI-SF

Moore [36]

Australia

Adult patients with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma

Parallel RCT

32

Median (range)

Txt: 66 (59 – 76)

Ctrl: 69 (62 – 71)

NR

Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale

Nimako [37]

UK

Adult patients receiving cancer treatment

RCT

Txt: 45

Ctrl 1: 47

Ctrl 2: 46

Median (range)

Txt: 66 (32—80)

Ctrl 1: 66 (19—83)

Ctrl 2: 64 (35 – 85)

Txt: 44%

Ctrl 1: 45%

Ctrl 2: 46%

EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, the number of QoL issues identified, the number of management actions, the number of contacts outside of clinics

Nipp [38]

USA

Adult patients with a diagnosis of advanced cancer receiving inpatient oncology services

RCT

Txt: 75

Ctrl: 75

Txt: 60.4 (14.6)

Ctrl: 64.9 (12.4)

Txt: 40.0%

Ctrl: 41.3%

ESAS, PHQ-4, hospital length of stay, unplanned readmission within 30 and 90 days of hospital discharge

Nipp [52]

USA

Adult patients with a diagnosis of advanced cancer

RCT

Txt: 160

Ctrl: 161

Txt: 64.5 (12.4)

Ctrl: 62.7 (13.1)

Txt: 43.8%

Ctrl: 44.1%

ESAS, PHQ-4, hospital length of stay, unplanned readmission within 30 and 90 days of hospital discharge

Rosenbloom [39]

USA

Adult patients with metastatic breast, lung, or colorectal cancers

Cluster RCT

Txt 1: 73

Txt 2: 69

Ctrl: 71

Txt 1: 60.2 (11.0)

Txt 2: 57.3 (11.8)

Ctrl: 60.6 (9.3)

Txt 1: 30%

Txt 2: 33%

Ctrl: 36%

FLIC, Brief POMS-17, PSQ-III, author-developed clinical treatment change assessment tool

Ruland (2003)

Norway

Adult oncology patients receiving treatment in outpatient clinics

Cluster RCT

Txt: 27

Ctrl: 25

56.3 (11.3)

59%

CHOICE, time requirement to complete the assessment, Ease of Use scale, 12-item Patient Satisfaction with Decision Making questionnaire

Ruland [40]

USA

Adult patients initiating treatment for leukemia or lymphoma

RCT

Txt: 75

Ctrl: 70

Txt: 50 (15)

Ctrl: 49 (15)

Txt: 40%

Ctrl: 36%

Changes in symptom distress and changes in patients’ needs using an author-developed assessment tool

Strasser [42]

Switzerland

Adult patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy with palliative intentions for incurable, symptomatic solid tumors

Cluster RCT

Txt: 119

Ctrl: 145

Median (range)

Txt: 65 (40—84)

Ctrl: 67 (35—84)

Txt: 51%

Ctrl: 47%

EORTC-QLQ-C30, ESAS, patient-physician communication using a validated scale, KPS

Tolstrup [43]

Denmark

Adult patients initiating immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments for unresectable stage III or IV disease

RCT

Txt: 73

Ctrl: 73

Median (range)

Txt: 66 (34 – 87)

Ctrl: 66 (32 – 83)

Txt: 52%

Ctrl: 41%

CTCAE for changes in adverse event frequency and severity, number of extra outpatient visits

Trowbridge [44]

USA

Adult cancer patients with oncologic pain

RCT

Txt: 260

Ctrl: 250

Median (range)

Txt: 65.6 (18 – 92)

Ctrl: 65.8 (21 – 91)

Txt: 57%

Ctrl: 46%

Pain management index

Velikova [15]

UK

Adult cancer patients

RCT

Txt: 144

Ctrl 1: 70

Ctrl 2: 72

Txt: 55.1 (13.0)

Ctrl 1: 54.8 (12.5)

Ctrl 2: 54.7 (11.7)

Txt: 75%

Ctrl 1: 70%

Ctrl 2: 73%

FACT-G

van der Hout [45]

The Netherlands

Adult patients with a diagnosis of lymphoma, and head and neck, colorectal, and breast cancers

RCT

Txt: 320

Ctrl: 305

Median (range)

Txt: 65 (56 – 71)

Ctrl: 65 (57 – 71)

Txt: 49%

Ctrl: 52%

Patient activation measure, EORTC QLQ-C30, supportive care needs, general self-efficacy scale, Pearlin and Schooler mastery scale, perceived efficacy patient-physician interactions scale

Wheelock [46]

USA

Adult patients with TNM stage I to III breast cancer

RCT

Txt: 59

Ctrl: 41

Txt: 54.8 (8.7)

Ctrl: 53.3 (10.8)

Txt: 100%

Ctrl: 100%

Time in days between symptom reporting and remote valuation of symptoms, number of breast cancer-related visits, medical appointments, lab and image studies

Wolfe [47]

USA

Pediatric cancer patients

Parallel RCT

Txt: 51

Ctrl: 53

Txt: 68% >  = 8 years old

Ctrl 69% >  = 8 years old

Txt: 51%

Ctrl: 47%

PQ-MSAS, PedsQL4.0, Sickness scores

Zhang [51]

China

Adult patients receiving cancer immunotherapy

RCT

Txt: 141

Ctrl: 137

Txt: 57.6 (12.6)

Ctrl: 60.1 (12.7)

Txt: 24.8%

Ctrl: 27.0%

Rate of occurrence of grade 3 or 4 irAEs, ED visits, rate of treatment discontinuation and death owing to irAEs, QLQ-C30

  1. BDI – SF, Beck depression inventory – short form; BIPQ, the brief illness perception questionnaire; BPI, brief pain Inventory; BQ-II, the barriers questionnaire II; CHOICE, creating better health outcomes by improving communication about patients’ experiences; CNB, the care notebook; CNQ, care needs questionnaire – short form; COOP, Dartmouth primary care cooperative information functional health assessment; Ctrl, control group; ED, emergency department; EHR, electronic health record; eLCSS-QL, the electronic lung cancer symptom scale; EORTC QLQ-C30, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire C30; EORTC QLQ-LC13, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire – lung cancer 13; EQ-5D-5, five level version of EuroQol five-dimensional; EQ-5D-VAS, EuroQol five-dimensional using visual analogue scale; ESAS, Edmonton symptom assessment system; ESRA-C, electronic self-report assessment for cancer; FACT-G, the functional assessment of cancer therapy – general; FACT-L, the functional assessment of cancer therapy – lung; FACT-PWB, the functional assessment of cancer therapy – physical and well-being; FLIC, functional living index – cancer; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; HCT-CI, hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index; HRQL, health-related quality of life; irAE, immune-related adverse events; IVR, interactive voice response; KPS, the Karnofsky performance scale index; MCQ-C, medical care questionnaire – communication; MDASI, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory; MOS, medical outcomes study; NCCN DT, national comprehensive cancer network distress thermometer; NR, not reported; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PC, personal computer; PEDsQL4.0, the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 generic core scales; PEPPI, perceived efficacy in patient – physician interactions; PFS, progression-free survival; PHQ, patient health questionnaire; POMS-17, profile of mood states – 17; PQ-MSAS, the PediQUEST memorial symptom assessment scale; PRO-CTCAE, patient-reported outcome version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events; PSQ-III, patient satisfaction questionnaire – III; QLU-C10D, the EORTC quality of life utility measure-Core 10 dimensions; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SF-36, 36-item short-form health survey; Txt, treatment group; WONCA, World Organization Project of National Colleges and Academics