Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review

Author

Study design

PROM measurement

Period of enrollment

Mean age

(SD)

Gender

Participation in the study by eligible individuals

Proportion of patients that completed PROM

Country

Delgado, 2015

Multicenter Observational

Prospective

At 6, 12, 36, 60, and 120 months after HT

December 2010 and December 2011

56.4 (11.4)

77.9% male

22.1% female

331 of 350 (94.57%)

86.6% (303 of 350 HT patients)

Spain

Farmer, 2013*

Multicenter Observational

Prospective

At enrollment before HT and every 6 months during follow-up. The average follow-up per patient was 2.5 years

July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1999

54 (–)

79% male

21% female

597 of 885 (67%)

93.0% (555 of 597 HT patients)

USA

Harper, 1998

Observational

Prospective

At enrollment before HT

From November 1989 to June 1994

53.16 (11.19)

86% male

14% female

90 of 136 (66%)

100% (90 of 90 HT patients)

USA

O’Brien, 1987

Observational

Prospective at 2 medical centers

Before HT, once patients where accepted for HT at 3 months intervals

After HT at 3 months intervals during 4.5 years

From April 1982 to 30 June 1985

42.8 (–)

92.8% male

7.2% female

73 of 221 (33%)

100% (73 of 73 HT patients)

UK

White-Williams, 2013*

Retrospective analysis of a prospective longitudinal study at 4 medical centers*

At 5 and 10 years after HT

July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1999

53.8 (–)

78% male

22% female

597 of 884 (68%)

39% (216 of 555 HT patients)

USA

  1. *Same cohort of HT patients