Skip to main content
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Table 5 DAILY EATS Ability to Detect Change Results

From: Psychometric evaluation of the DAILY EATS questionnaire in individuals living with obesity

Change in supporting measure from BL to EOT a

Correlation with change in DAILY EATS scores

STUDY 1 – obesity without T2DM (n = 76 to 91)

STUDY 2 – obesity with T2DM (n = 142

Item 2. Worst hunger

Item 3. Appetite

Item 4. Cravings

EDI

Item 2. Worst hunger

Item 3. Appetite

Item 4. Cravings

EDI

PGIS-Hunger

0.50*

0.59*

0.42*

0.54*

0.41*

0.46*

0.38*

0.45*

PGIS-Cravings

0.21

0.33*

0.45*

0.36*

0.44*

0.48*

0.48*

0.51*

PGIS-Appetite

0.59*

0.64*

0.59*

0.66*

0.55*

0.61*

0.58*

0.63*

PGIS-Satiety

0.28

0.35*

0.38*

0.37*

0.25*

0.30*

0.34*

0.32*

PGIS-PF

0.17

0.23

0.28

0.25

0.20

0.23*

0.17

0.22

PGIC-Hunger

0.49*

0.56*

0.59*

0.59*

0.43*

0.42*

0.46*

0.49*

PGIC-Cravings

0.48*

0.52*

0.58*

0.57*

0.39*

0.40*

0.43*

0.45*

EWM a

−0.10

−0.16

−0.17

−0.15

— a

— a

— a

— a

BMI

0.35*

0.38*

0.35*

0.39*

0.29*

0.30*

0.31*

0.33*

% BMI

0.32*

0.36*

0.34*

0.37*

0.30*

0.32*

0.33*

0.35*

% Weight

0.32*

0.36*

0.34*

0.37*

0.30*

0.32*

0.33*

0.35*

IWQOL-Lite total score

−0.30*

−0.31*

−0.29*

−0.33*

− 0.29*

− 0.27*

− 0.27*

− 0.30*

  1. Bolded values indicate measures with most-similar concepts (in the case of PGIS and PGIC measures)
  2. BL Baseline, EDI Eating Drivers Index, EOT End of treatment, EWM Ease of weight management, IWQOL-Lite 31-item Impact of Weight on Quality of Life, PGIC Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIS Patient Global Impression of Severity, PGIS-PF PGIS-Physical Functioning, PROMIS PF SF Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form, T2DM Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  3. aOnly Study 1 includes EWM, PROMIS PF SF 8b, and Week 26/EOT; Study 2 uses PROMIS PF SF 10a and Week 12/EOT
  4. * P <  0.01 for H0: ρ = 0
Back to article page