Table 13 Interpretation of Change: Study 2, Severely Obese With T2DM
From: Psychometric evaluation of the DAILY EATS questionnaire in individuals living with obesity
Score/Methods | Changes in DAILY EATS from BL to EOT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDI | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Hunger | ||||
3-point improvement | 1 | −3.5 (−) | − 3.5, − 3.5, − 3.5 | − 3.5 - -3.5 |
2-point improvement | 17 | −2.5 (2.58) | −3.2, − 1.6, − 0.9 | −8.3 - 0.2 |
1-point improvement | 52 | −1.5 (1.73) | − 2.8, − 1.6, − 0.4 | −6.0 - 2.2 |
No difference | 55 | − 0.6 (1.14) | − 1.3, − 0.4, 0.3 | −4.0 - 1.6 |
1-point worsening | 17 | 0.0 (1.80) | −1.1, − 0.2, 0.7 | −2.9 - 5.1 |
2-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Hunger | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 50 | −2.0 (2.06) | −3.3, −1.8, −0.4 | −8.3 - 1.5 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 29 | −1.2 (1.24) | − 1.9, − 1.3, − 0.1 | −4.0 - 1.0 |
3 = A little less hungry | 27 | −0.6 (1.21) | −1.3, − 0.5, 0.2 | −3.0 - 1.6 |
4 = No change | 24 | − 0.0 (1.35) | − 0.5, 0.2, 0.6 | − 4.5 - 2.2 |
5 = A little hungrier | 1 | 1.8 (−) | 1.8, 1.8, 1.8 | 1.8–1.8 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 8 | − 0.9 (1.09) | − 1.5, − 1.2, − 0.6 | − 2.0 - 1.5 |
7 = Much hungrier | 3 | 0.6 (3.97) | −2.2, − 1.1, 5.1 | − 2.2 - 5.1 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 0.88 | |||
SEM | 0.88 | |||
DAILY EATS Item 2. Worst Hunger | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Hunger | ||||
3-point improvement | 1 | −3.1 (−) | − 3.1, − 3.1, − 3.1 | − 3.1 - -3.1 |
2-point improvement | 17 | −2.2 (2.61) | −3.2, − 1.1, − 0.4 | −7.9 - 0.7 |
1-point improvement | 52 | − 1.6 (2.00) | − 3.0, − 1.5, − 0.2 | −6.6 - 2.7 |
No difference | 55 | − 0.5 (1.37) | − 1.4, − 0.6, 0.4 | −3.9 - 2.6 |
1-point worsening | 17 | 0.2 (1.82) | −0.7, − 0.1, 1.1 | −2.7 - 5.1 |
2-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Hunger | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 50 | −2.0 (2.20) | −3.1, −1.9, −0.3 | −7.9 - 2.6 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 29 | −1.1 (1.30) | − 2.1, − 0.9, − 0.1 | −3.9 - 0.7 |
3 = A little less hungry | 27 | −0.6 (1.61) | − 1.7, − 0.7, 0.6 | − 3.6 - 2.6 |
4 = No change | 24 | −0.1 (1.74) | − 0.9, 0.1, 1.0 | − 6.1 - 2.7 |
5 = A little hungrier | 1 | 2.1 (−) | 2.1, 2.1, 2.1 | 2.1–2.1 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 8 | − 0.6 (0.88) | − 1.0, − 0.7, − 0.6 | −1.6 - 1.4 |
7 = Much hungrier | 3 | 0.4 (4.21) | −2.9, −1.1, 5.1 | − 2.9 - 5.1 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 0.93 | |||
SEM | 1.00 | |||
DAILY EATS Item 3. Appetite | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Appetite | ||||
3-point improvement | 1 | −8.2 (−) | −8.2, −8.2, − 8.2 | −8.2 - -8.2 |
2-point improvement | 16 | −3.0 (1.94) | −3.7, −2.9, − 1.6 | − 8.0 - -0.2 |
1-point improvement | 66 | −1.5 (1.47) | −2.1, − 1.3, − 0.4 | −6.0 - 1.6 |
No difference | 55 | − 0.1 (1.48) | − 1.1, − 0.1, 0.6 | − 3.9 - 4.7 |
1-point worsening | 4 | 0.3 (1.45) | −1.0, 0.4, 1.5 | − 1.3 - 1.6 |
2-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Hunger | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 50 | −2.0 (2.07) | −3.0, −1.4, −0.6 | −8.2 - 1.9 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 29 | −1.1 (1.35) | − 2.1, − 1.4, 0.0 | − 3.9 - 1.1 |
3 = A little less hungry | 27 | − 0.5 (1.27) | −1.4, − 0.6, 0.4 | −3.1 - 1.6 |
4 = No change | 24 | −0.1 (1.47) | − 1.1, 0.0, 0.7 | −4.3 - 3.3 |
5 = A little hungrier | 1 | 2.4 (−) | 2.4, 2.4, 2.4 | 2.4–2.4 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 8 | − 1.1 (1.32) | − 1.9, − 1.4, − 0.8 | − 2.4 - 1.9 |
7 = Much hungrier | 3 | −0.2 (4.52) | − 4.1, − 1.3, 4.7 | −4.1 - 4.7 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 0.88 | |||
SEM | 1.12 | |||
DAILY EATS Item 4. Cravings | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Cravings | ||||
3-point improvement | 7 | −3.0 (4.12) | −8.0, − 1.7, 0.7 | −9.1 - 1.6 |
2-point improvement | 25 | −2.8 (1.89) | −4.1, −3.1, − 1.7 | −5.7 - 1.3 |
1-point improvement | 44 | −1.2 (1.40) | − 1.9, − 1.1, − 0.3 | − 4.0 - 1.6 |
No difference | 52 | −0.3 (1.63) | − 1.6, − 0.4, 0.8 | −3.0 - 4.7 |
1-point worsening | 13 | 0.2 (1.98) | −0.9, − 0.4, 1.1 | − 2.0 - 5.6 |
2-point worsening | 1 | −1.7 (−) | − 1.7, − 1.7, − 1.7 | − 1.7 - -1.7 |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Cravings | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 44 | − 2.1 (2.30) | −3.4, − 1.6, − 0.2 | − 9.1 - 1.6 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 39 | −1.2 (1.68) | − 2.4, − 1.1, − 0.1 | − 4.6 - 2.4 |
3 = A little less hungry | 21 | −0.8 (1.41) | −1.9, − 1.3, − 0.1 | − 2.7 - 2.3 |
4 = No change | 24 | − 0.2 (1.30) | − 1.2, − 0.2, 0.9 | − 3.0 - 1.6 |
5 = A little hungrier | 7 | 0.8 (2.36) | − 1.0, 0.6, 3.0 | − 1.9 - 4.7 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 4 | − 1.6 (2.50) | − 3.3, − 1.3, 0.1 | −4.9 - 1.1 |
7 = Much hungrier | 3 | 1.3 (3.88) | − 2.0, 0.3, 5.6 | − 2.0 - 5.6 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 1.05 | |||
SEM | 1.11 | |||