Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the VISTA and MGAT studies

From: The responsiveness of goal attainment scaling using just one goal in controlled clinical trials: an exploratory analysis

 

Video-Imaging Synthesis of Treating Alzheimer’s Disease (VISTA)

Mobile Geriatric Assessment Team (MGAT)

Design

Double-blind, placebo controlled RCT

Single-blind RCT – Assessments were performed by healthcare professionals blind to patient status

Participants

Community-dwelling adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s Disease (n = 130)

Rural, community-dwelling, frail elderly patients (n = 182)

Intervention

Patients were randomized to receive either galantamine (16–24 mg/d) or a placebo for a 4-month period

Patients were randomized to receive either usual care by family physicians or care in which physician efforts were supplemented by a specialized geriatric intervention over a 3-month period

Primary Outcome Measure

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)

GAS Methodology

Assessment:

Two independent GAS assessments were conducted at each time-point.

- Patient/caregiver-rated GAS was assessed in a clinician-facilitated interview

- Clinician-rated GAS was assessed following interviews with patients and/or caregivers.

Assessment:

Patient-rated GAS was assessed in a clinician-facilitated interview both at baseline and three-month follow-up

Goal setting:

Goals were freely selected based on symptoms considered important to the patient

Goal setting:

Participants selected goals based on a list of 42 symptoms or problems identified by the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)

Goal weighting:

Patients and caregivers ranked (weighted) their goals in order of importance.

Clinicians did not rank goals, so all were assigned a weighting of ‘1’

Goal weighting:

As goals were not ranked, all were assigned a weighting of ‘1’

Baseline scores:

Baseline raw GAS scores set at ‘0’

Baseline scores:

Baseline raw GAS scores were set at ‘-1’, except for a small number of participants (n = 5). These participants were assigned baseline scores of ‘-2’ based on the clinical judgement that their situation could not plausibly deteriorate.

Goal selection for one-goal GAS:

One-goal GAS scores were derived for patients/caregivers using their highest-ranking goal

One-goal GAS scores were derived for clinicians by selecting the first goal listed for each patient

Goal selection for one-goal GAS:

One-goal GAS scores were derived by randomly selecting a goal for each participant using a custom excel macro

 

Number of Goals Set:

The median number of goals set was 3 (range 1–6)

Number of Goals Set:

The median number of goals set was 5 (range 2–15)