Skip to main content

Table 4 Scores for methodological quality using COSMIN risk of bias checklist

From: A systematic review of the measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures used for adults with an ankle fracture

PROM

AAOS

A-FORM

OMAS

Article

Zelle et al. (2017) *

McPhail et al. (2014) *

Buker et al. (2017) *

Garratt et al. (2018)

Turhan et al. (2017) *

Olerud and Molander (1984)

PROM Development

 

Doubtful

   

Inadequate

Content Validity

      

Structural Validity

   

Doubtful

  

Internal Consistency

  

Doubtful

Doubtful

Doubtful

 

Cross cultural validity and measurement invariance

      

Reliability

Inadequate

 

Inadequate

Doubtful

Inadequate

 

Measurement Error

   

Doubtful

Doubtful

 

Criterion Validity

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Construct validity

Doubtful (Convergent validity)

 

Doubtful (Convergent validity)

Adequate (Convergent Validity) Doubtful (Known Groups Validity)

Adequate (Convergent validity)

 

Responsiveness

      
  1. Scores for methodological quality using COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist; available options are very good, adequate, doubtful, inadequate or N/A. Key: * = Articles were assessed by second reviewer for risk of bias and data extraction, N/A: Not applicable. A blank box indicates that the measurement property was not assessed in the study