Table 4 Responsiveness of PROMIS instruments and qDASH of patients from baseline
From: The responsiveness of the PROMIS instruments and the qDASH in an upper extremity population
Follow-up Period | Instrument | n | SRM [95% CI] | ES [95% CI] p-value | Paired t-test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-month follow-up | |||||
PROMIS PF | 31 | 1.05 [0.51, 1.57] | 0.84 [0.31, 1.35] | < 0.001 | |
PROMIS PI | 31 | 1.63 [1.04, 2.18] | 1.48 [0.90, 2.02] | < 0.001 | |
PROMIS UE | 28 | 1.26 [0.67, 1.81] | 1.05 [0.48, 1.59] | 0.006 | |
qDASH | 29 | 1.44 [0.84, 2.00] | 1.12 [0.28, 1.66] | < 0.001 | |
>3-month follow-up | |||||
PROMIS PF | 150 | 1.16 [0.91, 1.40] | 0.92 [0.68, 1.16] | < 0.001 | |
PROMIS PI | 176 | 1.09 [0.86, 1.31] | 0.99 [0.77, 1.21] | < 0.001 | |
PROMIS UE | 148 | 1.24 [0.99, 1.49] | 0.88 [0.64, 1.12] | 0.001 | |
qDASH | 149 | 1.26 [1.01, 1.51] | 0.97 [0.73, 1.21] | < 0.001 | |
6-month follow-up | |||||
PROMIS PF | 18 | 1.26 [0.52, 1.94] | 0.83 [0.13, 1.49] | < 0.001 | |
PROMIS PI | 20 | 1.16 [0.47, 1.80] | 0.79 [0.13, 1.42] | < 0.001 | |
PROMIS UE | 18 | 1.42 [0.66, 2.12] | 0.85 [0.15, 1.51] | 0.001 | |
qDASH | 18 | 1.36 [0.61, 2.05] | 0.80 [0.10, 1.46] | < 0.001 | |
>6-month follow-up | |||||
PROMIS PF | 52 | 1.25 [0.82, 1.66] | 0.87 [0.46, 1.27] | 0.033 | |
PROMIS PI | 61 | 1.15 [0.76, 1.53] | 0.96 [0.58, 1.33] | < 0.001 | |
PROMIS UE | 52 | 1.43 [0.99, 1.85] | 0.85 [0.44, 1.24] | 0.253 | |
qDASH | 55 | 1.26 [0.84, 1.66] | 0.93 [0.53, 1.32] | 0.006 | |