Skip to main content

Table 3 Opinions about PROs of healthcare providers in institutions that routinely use PROMs

From: Routine patient assessment and the use of patient-reported outcomes in specialized palliative care in Japan

 

Participants routinely using PROMs (n = 108)

Participants not routinely using PROMs (n = 350)

p-value

n

%

n

%

Useful in symptom management

99

92

276

79

0.002*

Patients cannot be assessed when their disease progresses

74

69

260

74

0.27

Influenced by the patient's level of cognitive function

57

53

215

61

0.12

Burdensome on patients

37

34

143

41

0.26

Time consuming in terms of explaining how to complete the form

25

23

77

22

0.79

Burdensome on healthcare providers

27

25

47

13

0.007*

Worries about addressing the reported symptoms

20

19

41

12

0.08

Healthcare provider can evaluate outcomes even if the patient does not self-evaluate

6

6

30

9

0.41

Not useful for symptom management

2

2

14

4

0.38

  1. PROs patient-reported outcomes, PROMs patient-reported outcome measures
  2. *Respondents had the option to choose multiple selections