Skip to main content

Table 2 Decisional regret assessment tools and reported results

From: Reviewing next of kin regrets in surgical decision-making: cross-sectional analysis of systematically searched literature

First author

Publication year

Decisional regret assessment

Reported results

Tool used

Categorisation of scale

Method of administration

Timing (months)

Next of kin with DR

[n/N, (%)]

Next of kin with strong DR

[n, (%)]

DRS score

Adult studies

        

Blumenthal-Barby

2015

DRS

Not reported

Face-to-Face or Phone

Not reported

1/13 (8)

Not reported

1.48 (0.78)a

Gullick

2009

Open question

Not applicable

Face-to-Face

6 and 12

1/14 (7)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Lillie

2014

DRS-adapted

Unclear

Mail

60 (not reported)a

114/517 (22)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Sahgal

2020

DRS-adapted

Not reported

Face-to-Face or Mail

0.4

Not reported

Not reported

12.5 (0–31)b

Schulman-Green

2020

Structured interview

Not applicable

Face-to-Face

Not reported

Not reported

Not applicable

Not applicable

Pediatric studies

        

Bethell

2020

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Online Survey

15.5 (9.6–21.1)b

154/340 (45)

21 (6)

Not reported for the entire sample

Carr

2016

DRS

0 no DR ≥ 26 moderate DR

Face-to-Face

1 to 3

55/94 (59)

9 (10)

8.78 (not reported)a

Carr

2017

DRS

 ≥ 26 moderate DR

Face-to-Face

13 (0.05 to 111)a

62/210 (30)

16 (8)

6.98 (13.74)a

Chan

2019

Closed question

Not applicable

Face-to-Face

< 6

0/9 (0)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Crombag

2021

Structured interview

Not applicable

Face-to-Face

3 to 6

0/29 (0)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Ellens

2017

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Not reported

12

12/45 (27)

3 (7)

Not applicable

Ghidini

2016

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

E-mail

60 (15–110)c

297/323 (92)

128 (40)

Not applicable

Hong

2017

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Face-to-Face

10 to 16

28/64 (44)

1 (2)

0 (0–15)b

Hong

2016

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Face-to-Face

6

24/62 (39)

2 (3)

0 (0–5)b

Javaid

2020

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Phone

Not reported

27/50 (54)

5 (10)

17.4 (21.8)a

Lonner

2020

Addition of a question on regret to the Patient Generated Index

 ≥ 1 DR (continuous scale from 1 to 10)

Not reported

Preoperative (anticipated regret)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Lorenzo

2014

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Face-to-Face

12

58/116 (50)

10 (9)

8.9 (12.3)a

Meenakshi-Sundaram

2018

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Not reported

49

Regret of patients and next of kin are combined

Not reported

7 (12)a

Neuhaus

2020

7 items, 4 point-Likert scale

Likert scale from 1 "strongly disagree" to 4 "stongly agree"

Online Survey

Not reported

97/219 (44)

Not reported

Not applicable

O'Loughlin

2013

Closed question

Not applicable

Face-to-Face or Phone

77 (43–89)b

2/89 (2)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Özveren

2016

Open question

Not applicable

Online Survey

0 to 60

3/623 (0.5)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Szymanski

2017

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR ≥ 51 strong DR ≥ 76 very strong DR

Online Survey

53 (not reported)b

8/39 (21)

0

5 (not reported)a

Van Engelen

2021

DRS

1–25 mild DR ≥ 26 moderate to strong DR

Online Survey

85.2 (28.8)a

49/97 (51)

11 (11)

9.7 (12.6)a

  1. References are listed in alphabetical order (first author's name)
  2. DR: Decisional Regret; DRS: Decision Regret Scale; DRS-adapted: Decision Regret Scale adapted by authors for next of kin
  3. aMean (sd); bmedian (IQR), cmedian (range)