Skip to main content

Table 5 Responsiveness of PROMs

From: A longitudinal validation of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS stand-alone component utilising the Oxford Hip Score in the Australian hip arthroplasty population

  Preoperative 6 Weeks Mean difference Paired t-test Effect size Standard response mean
(a) 6 weeks
OHS 13.73 ± 7.32 30.10 ± 9.08 16.37 ± 10.85  < 0.0001 2.16 (large) 1.51 (large)
EQ-5D-5L 0.08 ± 0.36 0.63 ± 0.27 0.56 ± 0.40  < 0.0001 1.53 (large) 1.40 (large)
EQ-VAS 61.57 ± 20.11 76.64 ± 15.83 15.07 ± 18.82  < 0.0001 0.75 (moderate) 0.80 (large)
  Preoperative 6 Months Mean difference Paired t-test Effect size Standard response mean
(b) 6 Months
OHS 13.71 ± 7.59 37.41 ± 9.23 23.70 ± 10.56  < 0.0001 3.12 (large) 2.24 (large)
EQ-5D-5L 0.10 ± 0.37 0.78 ± 0.26 0.69 ± 0.40  < 0.0001 1.88 (large) 1.70 (large)
EQ-VAS 62.00 ± 20.19 80.59 ± 13.90 18.59 ± 18.64  < 0.0001 0.92 (large) 1.00 (large)
  1. PROMs patient reported outcome measures, OHS Oxford Hip Score, EQ5D-5L EQ-5D-5L utility index score, EQ-VAS Visual analogue score of the EQ-5D-5L