Skip to main content

Table 5 Responsiveness of PROMs

From: A longitudinal validation of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS stand-alone component utilising the Oxford Hip Score in the Australian hip arthroplasty population

 

Preoperative

6 Weeks

Mean difference

Paired t-test

Effect size

Standard response mean

(a) 6 weeks

OHS

13.73 ± 7.32

30.10 ± 9.08

16.37 ± 10.85

 < 0.0001

2.16 (large)

1.51 (large)

EQ-5D-5L

0.08 ± 0.36

0.63 ± 0.27

0.56 ± 0.40

 < 0.0001

1.53 (large)

1.40 (large)

EQ-VAS

61.57 ± 20.11

76.64 ± 15.83

15.07 ± 18.82

 < 0.0001

0.75 (moderate)

0.80 (large)

 

Preoperative

6 Months

Mean difference

Paired t-test

Effect size

Standard response mean

(b) 6 Months

OHS

13.71 ± 7.59

37.41 ± 9.23

23.70 ± 10.56

 < 0.0001

3.12 (large)

2.24 (large)

EQ-5D-5L

0.10 ± 0.37

0.78 ± 0.26

0.69 ± 0.40

 < 0.0001

1.88 (large)

1.70 (large)

EQ-VAS

62.00 ± 20.19

80.59 ± 13.90

18.59 ± 18.64

 < 0.0001

0.92 (large)

1.00 (large)

  1. PROMs patient reported outcome measures, OHS Oxford Hip Score, EQ5D-5L EQ-5D-5L utility index score, EQ-VAS Visual analogue score of the EQ-5D-5L