Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the included PROMs

From: Quality of patient- and proxy-reported outcomes for children with impairment of the upper extremity: a systematic review using the COSMIN methodology

PROM (reference to first article)

Construct(s)

Target population

Mode of administration

Recall period

(Sub)scale(s) (number of items)

Response options

Range of scores/scoring

Original language

Available translations*

ABILHAND-Kids [33]

Manual ability

Children with cerebral palsy (> 6 yr)

Parent/proxy-report

3 months

1 scale (21 items)

3-level Likert rating scale

0–42 (raw sum score)

French/English

Ukrainian, Danish, Turkish, Arabic, Persian

ChARM [36]

Upper limb activity limitation

Children with cerebral palsy (5-16 yr)

Parent/proxy-report

 

1 scale (19 items)

Individual items have a differing number of response options

 

English

 

CHEQ [34]

Perceived problems with bimanual activities

Children with unilateral dysfunction (6-18 yr)

Parent/proxy- or self-report with assistance from parents/caregivers (for children ≤ 12 yr) Self-report (for children > 12 yr)

 

3 scales (29 items)

4-category rating scale

 

English

 

CHQ [50]

Health-related quality of life

Children and adolescents (5-18 yr)

Parent/proxy-report Self-report

Varies: ‘last 4 weeks’, ‘in general’

10 physical and psychosocial concepts (not reported for this CHQ-version)

4–6 level rating scale

Scores at concept-level Summary score (parent-reported version only)

English

 

CHSQ [38]

Manual ability

Children with disabilities (2-12 yr)

Parent/proxy-report

3 months

3 domains (21 items)

3-level Likert rating scale

 

English

Turkish

DHI [43]

Functional disability

Adults with disabilities

Self-report

 

1 scale that can be subdivided into 3 ‘factors’ (18 items)

5-point Likert rating scale

0–90

English

 

HUH [35]

The amount of spontaneous useof the affected hand

Children with unilateralupper limb paresis (3-10 yr)

Parent/proxy-report

 

1 scale (18 items)

5-point rating scale

Sum score (range 0–36) or Hand-Use-at-Home score in logits (interval scale, range − 4.69–5.17)

English

 

IMAL [51]

Caregiver perception of upper limb-use during daily activities

Children with neurological and functional impairments (< 2 yr)

Parent/proxy-report

 

2 subscales (20 items)

5-point Likert rating scale

 

English

 

PEDI self-care domain [52]

Ability to perform self-care activities

Children with physical disabilities

Parent/proxy-report

 

Self-care domain (7 items)

0–100

 

English

 

PODCI [53]

Perceived limitations

Children with musculoskeletal disorders

Parent/proxy-report Self-report

 

5 subscales, 1 total score (114 items)

0–100

0–100 (normalized score)

English

 

PODCI (v2.0) [25]

Perceived limitations

Children with musculoskeletal disorders

Parent/proxy-report (for children 2-10 yr) Self-report (for children 11-18 yr)

 

5 subscales, 1 total score (83/86 items)

0–100

0–100 (standardized score)

English

Dutch

PROMIS – Upper Extremity item bank (short form) [56]

Upper extremity function

The general population and children or adults living with chronic conditions

Parent/proxy-report Self-report

7-day recall period

1 scale (8 items)

5-point Likert rating scale

0–100 (normalized T-scores)

English

 

PROMIS Upper Extremity item bank (CAT) [56]

Upper extremity function

The general population and children or adults living with chronic conditions

Self-report

7-day recall period

1 scale (min 5 items, max 12 items)

5-point Likert rating scale

0–100 (normalized T-scores)

English

 

QuickDASH [57]

Upper extremity function

Adult patients with disabilities of the shoulder, arm, and/or hand

Self-report

 

1 scale (11 items)

5-point Likert rating scale

0–100 (summative scale)

English

 

Revised PMAL [39]

Upper limb-use in real-life situations

Children with cerebral palsy (6mo-8 yr)

Parent/proxy-report

 

2 subscales (number of items in revised PMAL unknown)

3-level Likert rating scale

0–2 per question (collapsed rating scale)

English

 
  1. Information adapted exclusively from studies included in this review
  2. yr = year, mo = month, ChARM = Children’s Arm Rehabilitation Measure, CHEQ = Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire, CHQ = Child Health Questionnaire, CHSQ = Children’s Hand-Skills ability Questionnaire, DHI = Duruöz Hand Index, HUH = Hand-Use-at-Home questionnaire, IMAL = Infant Motor Activity Log, PEDI = Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, PODCI = Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument, PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, CAT = computer-adaptive test, DASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, PMAL = Pediatric Motor Activity Log
  3. *PROM translations that have been cross-cultural adapted and/or validated in the population of interest of this review