Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Table 2 Factor loadings and goodness-of-fit-statistics of the CFA on three models of the SCVq

From: Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis

Item no	Factor loadings
Item no	1-factor model	3-factor model	5-factor model
2	0.80	0.81	0.83
3	0.83	0.83	0.86
20	0.85	0.86	0.88
5	0.90	0.91	0.93
9	0.78	0.78	0.80
10	0.90	0.90	0.98
11	0.83	0.84	0.90
12	0.86	0.86	0.94
17	0.84	0.85	0.91
18	0.75	0.75	0,79
19	0.94	0.94	1.00
4	0.54	0.58	0.58
6	0.60	0.65	0.65
7	0.84	0.90	0.90
8	0.85	0.92	0.92
13	0.39	0.42	0.42
14	0.51	0.55	0.55
15	0.47	0.61	0.61
16	0.45	0.56	0.56
Fit statistics
χ² (df)^a	394.30 (152)	357.75 (149)	286.15 (142)
χ²/df	2.59	2.40	2.02
RMSEA	0.057	0.053	0.045
CI-RMSEA	0.050; 0.064	0.046; 0.060	0.038; 0.053
SRMR	0.071	0.066	0.061
CFI	0.99	0.99	0.99

χ²/df = normed chi-square, CFI: Comparative Fit Index, CI-RMSEA: 90% confidence interval of RMSEA, RMSEA: Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation, SRMR: Standardized Root Mean Square Residual
^aSatorra-Bentler Scaled Chi-Square

Back to article page