Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient/physician demographic characteristics and patient diagnostic pathways

From: How do patients and physicians perceive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) as a disease? Results from Indian analysis of ITP World Impact Survey (I-WISh)

 

Patients

N = 65

Mean age, years

33

Male, n (%)

39 (60%)

Female, n (%)

26 (40%)

Current health state (Score: 1, very poor health; 7, excellent health)

 

 ≤ 4

26 (40%)

 Splenectomized, n (%)

6/64 (9.3%)

Diagnosis

 

Median (IQR) time from symptom presentation to diagnosis, months

1.5 (0.5–5.7)

 Symptom presentation to first consultation, months

0.7 (0.1–3.0)

 First consultation to diagnosis

0.5 (0.2–1.0)

Patients with a median time from initial presentation to ITP diagnosis > 6 months, n (%)

9/55 (16%)

Patients in whom diagnosis of ITP confirmed as a result of another health condition, n (%)

2 (3%)

Delay in diagnosis, n (%)

21 (32%)

 Awaiting additional test results

8 (38%)

 Specialist reference

7 (33%)

Patient support following diagnosis, n (%)

 

 Family/friends

59 (91%)

 Physicians

50 (77%)

 Nurses

24 (37%)

Patients who needed more support during the diagnosis process, n (%)

27 (42%)

 Physicians

20 (74%)

 Family/friends

13 (48%)

 Patient support groups

11 (41%)

 

Physicians

N = 21

Average total patient caseload

625

Number of ITP patients seen in the last 12 months

81

Practice setting

 

 Private care

12 (57%)

 Specialty cancer center

5 (24%)

 University teaching hospital and community teaching hospital

4 (19%)

Year of qualification

 

 Before 1981

1 (5%)

 1981–1993

3 (14%)

 1994–2003

5 (24%)

 2004–2014

10 (48%)

 After 2014

2 (10%)

Diagnosis

 

Median (IQR) time from symptom presentation to diagnosis, months

0.25 (0.25–0.62)

 Primary ITP

70%

 Secondary ITP

30%

Reasons for delay in diagnosis

 

 Specialist reference

13 (62%)

 Exclusion of other potential causes

12 (57%)

Causes of secondary ITP

 

 Systemic lupus erythematosus

11 (52%)

 Drug-induced thrombocytopenia

11 (52%)

 Hepatitis C virus

10 (48%)

 Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

8 (38%)

 Human immunodeficiency virus

7 (33%)

Investigation rates (asymptomatic vs high symptom burden)

 

 Spleen evaluation

12 (57%) vs 16 (76%)

 Coomb’s test

5 (24%) vs 13 (76%)

 H. pylori

3 (14%) vs 8 (28%)

 Computed tomography scan

1 (5%) vs 7 (33%)

 Platelet specific assay

0% vs 4 (19%)

Misdiagnosis rates

 

 Upto 25% patients are misdiagnosed

14 (67%)

 26–50% patients are misdiagnosed

5 (24%)

Most commonly misdiagnosed conditions

 

 Drug induced thrombocytopenia

12 (63%)

 Leukemia

11 (58%)

 Aplastic anemia

10 (53%)