Skip to main content

Table 4 Summarizes the average marginal effects for EQ-VAS derived disability weights and EQ-5D derived disability weights by different covariates after linear regression and marginal analysis

From: Hepatic schistosomiasis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and health related quality of life measurements from the Albert Nile Basin

 

Delta-method

dy/dx

95% Confidence Intervals

p value

Model 1—EQ-VAS derived disability weights

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

0.30

0.23, 0.37

0.001

Praziquantel

0.15

0.07, 0.22

0.001

Age range by decade

0.05

0.02, 0.07

0.001

Body Mass Index ≤ 18.5

0.05

− 0.05, 0.14

0.326

Female gender

0.07

0.00002, 0.13

0.050

Jaundice

− 0.12

− 0.20, − 0.04

0.004

Model 2—EQ-5D derived disability weights

Body mass index ≤ 18.5

0.19

0.05, 0.33

0.009

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

0.10

0.02, 0.18

0.018

Ascites

0.19

0.05, 0.32

0.010

Age range by decade

0.03

0.003, 0.06

0.031

Female gender

0.10

0.03, 0.18

0.006

Praziquantel

0.12

0.04, 0.20

0.003

Farmers

0.07

− 0.005, 0.14

0.069

World Health Organization Anemia grade

− 0.007

− 0.04, 0.03

0.690

  1. Marginal analysis enables examination of the impact of variable x (covariates) on outcome y (disability weights) for representative cases