Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals with phakic presbyopia

From: Evaluation of the content validity of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments developed for use with individuals with phakic presbyopia, including the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire-presbyopia (NAVQ-P) and the near vision correction independence (NVCI) instrument

Description

France (N = 10)

Germany (N = 10)

USA (N = 15)

Total (N = 35)

Participant demographic characteristics

Age

 Average (range)

55.9 (41–65)

51.1 (40–63)

53.6 (41–65)

53.5 (40–65)

Sex, n (%)

 Male

2 (20.0)

5 (50.0)

7 (46.7)

14 (40.0)

 Female

8 (80.0)

5 (50.0)

8 (53.3)

21 (60.0)

Race, n (%)

 Caucasian

Not appropriate to collect in France

7 (70.0)

4 (26.7)

11 (36.7)

 Black/African American

1 (10.0)

8 (53.3)

9 (30.0)

 Asian

2 (20.0)

2 (6.7)

 Other—Hispanic

3 (20.0)

3 (8.6)

 Missing data

10 (100)

10 (28.6)

Participant self-reported severity of presbyopia, n (%)

 Very severe

1 (10.0)

1 (10.0)

1 (6.7)

3 (8.6)

 Severe

1 (10.0)

3 (30.0)

4 (26.7)

8 (22.9)

 Moderate

7 (70.0)

7 (46.7)

14 (40.0)

 Mild

1 (10.0)

6 (60.0)

3 (20.0)

10 (28.6)

Participant self-reported myopia*

 No

5 (50.0)

6 (60.0)

8 (53.3)

19 (54.3)

 Yes

5 (50.0)

4 (40.0)

7 (46.7)

16 (45.7)

Participant clinical characteristics (reported by recruiting clinician)

Number of years since diagnosis*

 Average (range)

10.4 (0.5–20.9)

7.3 (1–17.1)

9.9 (0.2–34.6)

9.3 (0.2–34.6)

Visual acuity score, average (range)a

 Left eye (decimal)

0.92 (0.6–1.0)

0.67 (0.5–0.8)

0.55 (0.4–0.7)

0.68 (0.4–1.0)

 Right eye (decimal)

0.92 (0.6–1.0)

0.64 (0.4–0.8)

0.55 (0.3–1.0)

0.68 (0.3–1.0)

Severity of participants’ binocular DCNVA at 40 cm, n (%)

 Mild

2 (20.0)

6 (60.0)

5 (33.3)

13 (37.1)

 Moderate-severe

3 (30.0)

4 (40.0)

10 (66.7)

17 (48.6)

 Information not available

5 (50.0)

5 (14.3)

Severity of participants’ near ADD, n (%)

 Mild

3 (30.0)

6 (60.0)

5 (33.3)

14 (40.0)

 Moderate-severe

7 (70.0)

4 (40.0)

10 (66.7)

21 (60.0)

Clinician reported myopia/ near sightedness †

 None

6 (60.0)

5 (50.0)

8 (53.3)

19 (54.3)

 Mild

2 (20.0)

2 (13.3)

4 (11.4)

 Moderate

1 (10.0)

2 (13.3)

3 (8.6)

 High

1 (10.0)

3 (20.0)

4 (11.4)

 Missing data

5 (50.0)

5 (14.3)

Concomitant conditions, n (%)^

 Yes:

1 (10.0)

2 (13.3)

3 (8.6)

  Posterior detachment of the left vitreous

1 (10.0)

1 (2.9)

  Asthma

1 (6.7)

1 (2.9)

  Glaucoma

1 (6.7)

1 (2.9)

  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

1 (6.7)

1 (2.9)

Current treatment for presbyopia, n (%)^

 Glasses

7 (70.0)

5 (50.0)

10 (66.7)

22 (62.9)

  Unspecified

1/7 (14.3)

5/5 (100)

8/10 (80.0)

14 (40.0)

  Single vision

2/7 (28.6)

2/10 (20.0)

4 (11.4)

  Multifocal

4/7 (57.1)

4 (11.4)

Contact lenses

5 (50.0)

1 (6.7)

6 (17.1)

Missing data

3 (30.0)

5 (33.3)

8 (22.9)

  1. *One participant’s data was removed in this category only as it appeared to have an error
  2. aTwo participants data missing. ^Multiple answers possible. ~ This question was not collected on the demographic form in Germany so this information has been generated from what the patient reported during the interview. In addition, one patient reported myopia in the demographic form but reported that they did not have myopia during the interview. The clinician also reported that this patient did not have myopia, so this patient has not been counted as a myopic patient in the analyses of findings. †Clinicians were not asked to confirm diagnosis of myopia for the round 1 interviews