Skip to main content
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Table 5 Percentage of missing values in scores by mode of administration for patients with baseline data

From: Score equivalence of paper-, tablet-, and interactive voice response system-based versions of PROMIS, PRO-CTCAE, and numerical rating scales among cancer patients

Domain questionnaire and scale

% Missing PSAQ

% Missing CSAQ

% Missing IVR

p value all groups

p value PSAQ vs CSAQ

p value IVR vs others

Global/general health

      

PROMIS global mental

2.8

0.7

2.3

.0201

.0050

.4151

PROMIS global physical

2.6

0.5

2.5

.0103

.0031

.0009

NRS overall QOL

1.4

0.5

2.5

.0166

.1119

.0198

NRS emotional well-being

1.4

0.3

2.5

.0068

.0482

.0119

NRS mental well-being

1.7

0.3

2.7

.0053

.0186

.0170

Physical function

      

PROMIS physical function

1.2

1.2

3.7

.0021

.9290

.0009

NRS physical well-being

1.4

1.5

5.7

< .0001

.8513

< .0001

Social function

      

PROMIS social function

1.7

1.0

5.2

< .0001

.2983

< .0001

NRS social activity

2.6

2.5

5.2

.0173

.9147

.0069

Emotional distress—anxiety

      

PROMIS anxiety

2.0

1.0

5.2

< .0001

.1535

< .0001

NRS anxiety

2.0

1.5

5.4

.0001

.5133

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE anxiety frequency

2.0

1.5

5.4

.0001

.5133

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE anxiety severity

2.2

1.4

5.4

< .0001

.2782

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE anxiety interference

2.3

1.2

5.4

< .0001

.1298

< .0001

Emotional distress—depression

      

PROMIS depression

2.5

1.4

4.8

.0012

.1517

.0008

NRS depression

2.8

1.9

4.8

.0109

.2812

.0068

CTC cheer frequency

2.6

1.9

4.8

.0088

.3611

.0047

CTC Cheer severity

3.3

2.0

6.2

.0006

.1822

.0004

CTC cheer interference

3.0

1.7

6.0

.0002

.1460

.0001

CTC sad frequency

3.0

1.7

6.0

.0002

.1460

.0001

CTC sad severity

2.5

1.5

6.0

< .0001

.2324

< .0001

CTC sad interference

2.5

1.7

6.0

< .0001

.3349

< .0001

Fatigue

      

PROMIS fatigue

1.9

0.7

6.0

< .0001

.0660

< .0001

NRS fatigue

2.0

1.2

6.2

< .0001

.2476

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE fatigue severity

2.0

0.8

6.4

< .0001

.0866

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE fatigue interference

2.0

0.8

6.5

< .0001

.0866

< .0001

Sleep

      

PROMIS sleep disturbance

0.8

0.5

6.2

< .0001

.5581

< .0001

NRS sleep overall

1.2

0.8

6.4

< .0001

.4976

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE sleep severity

1.4

0.7

5.9

< .0001

.2163

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE sleep interference

1.9

1.0

5.7

< .0001

.2155

< .0001

Pain

      

PROMIS pain intensity

0.8

0.7

5.7

< .0001

.8393

< .0001

PROMIS pain interference

0.9

0.8

5.9

< .0001

.8753

< .0001

NRS pain frequency

1.1

0.8

5.9

< .0001

.6686

< .0001

NRS pain severity

0.9

1.2

5.9

< .0001

.6613

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE pain frequency

0.9

1.0

5.9

< .0001

.8786

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE pain severity

1.2

0.8

5.9

< .0001

.4976

< .0001

PRO-CTCAE pain interference

1.1

0.8

5.9

< .0001

.6686

< .0001

  1. The equality of proportion tests with χ2 test statistic were used to derive the p values. Because of multiple comparison concerns, p < .0001 will be used as a guideline to identify likely significant differences
Back to article page