Table 12 Interpretation of Change: Study 1, Severely Obese Without T2DM
From: Psychometric evaluation of the DAILY EATS questionnaire in individuals living with obesity
Score/Methods | Changes in DAILY EATS from BL to EOT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDI | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Hunger | ||||
3-point improvement | 0 | – | – | – |
2-point improvement | 4 | −3.5 (0.34) | − 3.8, − 3.4, − 3.2 | − 3.9 - -3.2 |
1-point improvement | 21 | −2.1 (1.36) | −3.0, − 2.1, − 0.9 | −4.7 - -0.3 |
No difference | 37 | −0.9 (1.66) | − 1.8, − 1.1, 0.6 | −5.9 - 1.4 |
1-point worsening | 13 | −0.7 (1.47) | −1.7, − 0.6, 0.5 | −3.3 - 1.4 |
2-point worsening | 1 | 5.8 (−) | 5.8, 5.8, 5.8 | 5.8–5.8 |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Hunger | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 27 | −2.9 (1.41) | −3.9, −3.0, − 2.0 | −5.9 - 0.0 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 17 | −1.3 (1.44) | −2.3, − 1.6, −0.4 | − 3.8 - 1.1 |
3 = A little less hungry | 23 | − 0.7 (1.31) | −1.7, − 0.6, 0.5 | −4.6 - 1.4 |
4 = No change | 12 | − 0.2 (1.04) | −0.8, − 0.4, 0.6 | −1.8 - 1.4 |
5 = A little hungrier | 5 | 0.2 (3.54) | − 2.1, − 0.6, 1.0 | − 3.3 - 5.8 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 5 | 0.3 (1.00) | − 0.0, 0.6, 1.2 | − 1.2 - 1.2 |
7 = Much hungrier | 1 | − 2.0 (−) | − 2.0, − 2.0, − 2.0 | −2.0 - -2.0 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 0.81 | |||
SEM | 0.56 | |||
DAILY EATS Item 2. Worst Hunger | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Hunger | ||||
3-point improvement | 0 | – | – | – |
2-point improvement | 4 | −3.2 (0.62) | −3.6, − 3.4, − 2.8 | − 3.7 - -2.3 |
1-point improvement | 21 | −1.9 (1.43) | −2.9, − 1.6, − 0.7 | −5.3 - 0.1 |
No difference | 37 | −0.7 (1.77) | − 1.4, − 0.7, 0.9 | −6.0 - 2.0 |
1-point worsening | 13 | − 0.7 (1.34) | − 1.1, − 0.7, 0.0 | − 2.7 - 1.3 |
2-point worsening | 1 | 6.0 (−) | 6.0, 6.0, 6.0 | 6.0–6.0 |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Hunger | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 27 | −2.6 (1.70) | −3.9, − 2.6, − 1.3 | −6.0 - 0.1 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 17 | − 1.0 (1.76) | −2.4, − 1.4, − 0.3 | −3.6 - 2.0 |
3 = A little less hungry | 23 | −0.6 (1.63) | −1.6, − 0.7, 0.6 | −4.9 - 3.1 |
4 = No change | 12 | − 0.2 (0.93) | − 0.8, − 0.5, 0.6 | −1.4 - 1.4 |
5 = A little hungrier | 5 | 0.1 (3.64) | − 2.7, − 1.0, 1.1 | − 2.7 - 6.0 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 5 | 0.5 (1.00) | 0.0, 0.9, 1.0 | − 1.0 - 1.6 |
7 = Much hungrier | 1 | −2.9 (−) | − 2.9, − 2.9, − 2.9 | − 2.9 - -2.9 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 0.87 | |||
SEM | 0.80 | |||
DAILY EATS Item 3. Appetite | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Appetite | ||||
3-point improvement | 0 | – | – | – |
2-point improvement | 5 | −3.4 (1.07) | −4.3, − 3.0, −2.9 | −4.7 - -2.1 |
1-point improvement | 28 | − 1.9 (1.86) | −3.3, − 1.8, − 0.8 | −5.0 - 2.0 |
No difference | 38 | −0.5 (1.28) | − 1.1, − 0.3, 0.4 | − 3.4 - 2.1 |
1-point worsening | 5 | 1.8 (2.79) | 0.6, 1.4, 2.3 | − 1.4 - 6.1 |
2-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Hunger | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 27 | −2.8 (1.62) | −4.3, − 2.9, − 2.0 | −5.1 - 0.1 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 17 | −1.0 (1.66) | −2.3, − 1.3, −0.3 | − 3.4 - 2.0 |
3 = A little less hungry | 23 | − 0.6 (1.42) | −1.1, − 0.7, 0.4 | − 5.3 - 1.9 |
4 = No change | 12 | −0.0 (1.55) | −1.2, 0.1, 1.3 | −2.4 - 2.3 |
5 = A little hungrier | 5 | 0.4 (3.55) | −1.4, −0.1, 0.9 | − 3.3 - 6.1 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 5 | 0.5 (1.13) | 0.3, 0.4, 0.9 | −1.0 - 2.1 |
7 = Much hungrier | 1 | −1.3 (−) | − 1.3, − 1.3, − 1.3 | − 1.3 - -1.3 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 0.82 | |||
SEM | 0.80 | |||
DAILY EATS Item 4. Cravings | ||||
Anchor-based Methods | n | Mean (SD) | Q1, Median, Q3 | Min-Max |
Based on PGIS-Cravings | ||||
3-point improvement | 3 | −3.8 (1.57) | −5.3, − 3.9, − 2.1 | − 5.3 - -2.1 |
2-point improvement | 11 | −3.0 (1.37) | −4.1, − 2.9, − 1.6 | − 5.1 - -1.1 |
1-point improvement | 26 | −2.0 (1.77) | − 3.4, − 1.6, − 0.9 | − 5.3 - 1.0 |
No difference | 31 | −0.8 (2.29) | − 2.3, − 0.7, 0.6 | −6.7 - 5.3 |
1-point worsening | 5 | − 0.4 (2.35) | − 0.4, 0.3, 0.4 | −4.3 - 2.0 |
2-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
3-point worsening | 0 | – | – | – |
Based on PGIC-Cravings | ||||
1 = Much less hungry | 28 | −3.5 (1.58) | −4.6, − 3.5, −2.9 | −6.7 - 0.4 |
2 = Moderately less hungry | 15 | −0.9 (1.53) | −2.1, − 1.3, 0.7 | −3.0 - 2.0 |
3 = A little less hungry | 15 | − 1.2 (1.17) | − 1.9, − 1.4, − 0.3 | − 3.6 - 1.0 |
4 = No change | 17 | − 0.9 (1.64) | − 1.7, − 1.3, − 0.3 | −3.1 - 4.0 |
5 = A little hungrier | 9 | 0.3 (2.24) | −0.6, 0.1, 0.9 | −2.4 - 5.3 |
6 = Moderately hungrier | 3 | 0.4 (0.72) | −0.3, 0.3, 1.1 | −0.3 - 1.1 |
7 = Much hungrier | 3 | −1.8 (2.15) | −3.9, −2.0, 0.4 | − 3.9 - 0.4 |
Distribution-based Methods | Estimate | |||
Half-SD | 0.97 | |||
SEM | 0.78 | |||