Skip to main content

Table 11 DAILY EATS Ability to Detect Change: Longitudinal Construct Validity

From: Psychometric evaluation of the DAILY EATS questionnaire in individuals living with obesity

DAILY EATS/Subgroup

ANOVA Results

Predicting Change in DAILY EATS Change Scores (Baseline to EOT a) from Subgroup

Study 1 – Obesity Without T2DM

Study 2 – Obesity With T2DM

DAILY EATS Item 2. Worst Hunger

PGIS-Hunger

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

25

−2.1 (0.35)

70

−1.8 (0.20)

Stable

37

−0.7 (0.29)

55

−0.4 (0.23)

Worsened

14

−0.2 (0.47)

17

0.2 (0.41)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

7.18

0.0014

 

15.76

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Stable

 

−0.8

− 3.15

0.0072

 

−0.8

−4.66

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−1.1

−3.33

0.0041

 

−1.1

−4.36

<  0.0001

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−0.3

−0.94

0.7228

 

−0.3

−1.22

0.5344

PGIC-Hunger

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

67

−1.5 (0.23)

106

−1.4 (0.17)

Stable

12

−0.2 (0.55)

24

−0.0 (0.35)

Worsened

11

0.0 (0.57)

12

0.4 (0.50)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

5.16

0.0076

 

10.41

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Stable

 

−0.8

−2.32

0.0665

 

−0.8

−3.54

0.0016

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−0.9

−2.54

0.0383

 

−1.0

−3.34

0.0032

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−0.1

− 0.24

0.9936

 

−0.2

−0.61

0.9033

ESE (SD of Baseline Score)

 

−0.7 (1.75)

 

−0.6 (1.77)

SRM (SD of Change Score)

 

−0.6 (1.99)

 

−0.5 (1.84)

DAILY EATS Item 3. Appetite

PGIS-Appetite

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

33

−2.1 (0.29)

83

−1.8 (0.18)

Stable

38

−0.5 (0.27)

55

−0.1 (0.23)

Worsened

5

1.8 (0.74)

4

0.3 (0.84)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

16.29

<  0.0001

 

18.50

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Stable

 

−1.0

−4.12

0.0003

 

−1.0

−5.85

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−2.4

−4.91

<  0.0001

 

−1.2

−2.43

0.0478

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−1.4

−2.89

0.0151

 

−0.2

−0.44

0.9605

PGIC-Hunger

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

67

−1.6 (0.23)

106

−1.4 (0.18)

Stable

12

−0.0 (0.54)

24

−0.1 (0.37)

Worsened

11

0.3 (0.57)

12

−0.6 (0.53)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

7.32

0.0012

 

5.80

0.0038

Improved vs. Stable

 

−0.9

−2.65

0.0286

 

−0.8

−3.24

0.0044

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−1.2

−3.12

0.0074

 

−0.5

−1.47

0.3709

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−0.2

− 0.44

0.9605

 

0.3

0.81

0.8069

ESE (SD of Baseline Score)

 

−0.7 (1.65)

 

−0.6 (1.76)

SRM (SD of Change Score)

 

−0.5 (2.03)

 

−0.6 (1.88)

DAILY EATS Item 4. Cravings

PGIS-Cravings

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

40

−2.4 (0.32)

76

−1.9 (0.22)

Stable

31

−0.8 (0.36)

52

−0.3 (0.27)

Worsened

5

−0.4 (0.90)

14

0.1 (0.51)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

6.13

0.0035

 

13.01

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Stable

 

−0.8

−3.21

0.0059

 

−0.7

−4.46

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−1.0

−2.07

0.1204

 

−0.9

−3.52

0.0018

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−0.2

− 0.44

0.9599

 

−0.2

−0.73

0.8470

PGIC-Cravings

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

58

−2.2 (0.25)

104

−1.5 (0.19)

Stable

17

−0.9 (0.46)

24

−0.2 (0.40)

Worsened

15

−0.1 (0.49)

14

0.2 (0.53)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

9.13

0.0003

 

7.58

0.0007

Improved vs. Stable

 

−0.7

−2.57

0.0349

 

−0.6

−2.81

0.0170

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−1.1

−3.89

0.0006

 

−0.8

−3.09

0.0073

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−0.4

−1.17

0.5669

 

−0.2

−0.72

0.8527

ESE (SD of Baseline Score)

 

−0.8 (1.95)

   

−0.5 (2.11)

  

SRM (SD of Change Score)

 

−0.7 (2.10)

   

−0.5 (2.07)

  

EDI

PGIS-Hunger

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

25

−2.3 (0.34)

70

−1.8 (0.20)

Stable

37

−0.9 (0.28)

55

−0.6 (0.23)

Worsened

14

−0.2 (0.45)

17

0.0 (0.41)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

8.56

0.0005

 

11.98

<  0.0001

Improved vs. Stable

 

−0.9

−3.29

0.0047

 

−0.7

−3.91

0.0004

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−1.3

−3.75

0.0011

 

−1.0

− 3.97

0.0004

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−0.4

−1.28

0.4995

 

−0.4

−1.33

0.4625

PGIC-Hunger

n

LS Mean (SE)

n

LS Mean (SE)

Improved

67

−1.7 (0.21)

106

−1.4 (0.17)

Stable

12

−0.2 (0.50)

24

−0.0 (0.35)

Worsened

11

0.0 (0.52)

12

−0.3 (0.50)

Comparisons

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

 

Cohen’s d

F/t

Adjusted P Value

Overall

 

8.19

0.0006

 

7.91

0.0006

Improved vs. Stable

 

−1.0

−2.94

0.0125

 

−0.8

−3.60

0.0013

Improved vs. Worsened

 

−1.1

−3.18

0.0061

 

−0.7

−2.17

0.0922

Stable vs. Worsened

 

−0.1

− 0.27

0.9906

 

0.2

0.43

0.9628

ESE (SD of Baseline Score)

 

−0.8 (1.63)

 

− 0.6 (1.76)

SRM (SD of Change Score)

 

−0.7 (1.88)

 

−0.6 (1.82)

  1. For each study, the psychometric analysis sample included all patients in the modified intent-to-treat clinical analysis data set who completed at least one DAILY EATS item at least 1 day at baseline and also at least 1 day in a follow-up week
  2. ANOVA Analysis of variance, EDI Eating Drivers Index, EOT End of treatment, ESE Effect-size estimate, F F-statistic, PF Physical functioning, PGIC Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIS Patient Global Impression of Status, PROMIS Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, SD Standard deviation, SE Standard error, SF Short form, SRM Standardized response mean, t T-statistic, T2DM Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  3. aOnly study Study 1 includes ease of weight management, PROMIS PF SF 8b, and Week 26/EOT; Study 2 uses PROMIS PF SF 10a and Week 12/EOT