Skip to main content

Table 5 Anchor-based CID estimates for improvement for the FACT-Cog total score (33 item) and FACT-Cog-PCI based on changes from baseline at post-intervention (T2) and six month follow-up (T3) and secondary anchor FACT-G. Correlations, ρ, are for the change in the FACT-Cog total score or PCI subscale and the categorized anchor changes

From: Important differences and meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)

FACT-Cog scale

Time, Anchor

Anchor changea

N (%)

Mean change in FACT-Cog (SD)

MCT Estimateb

Standardized effect size

% of scale

Total score

T2, FACT-G

ρ = 0.44

 

Much better

73 (38)

28.7 (22.5)

   

Minimally better

27 (14)

18.5 (21.1)

9.9 (9.1)

0.43 (0.40)

7.5 (6.9)

No change

43 (22)

8.6 (12.4)

   

Minimally worse

26 (14)

6.9 (17.0)

   

Much worse

13 (7)

12.9 (17.2)

   

T3, FACT-G

ρ = 0 0.47

 

Much better

57 (31)

30.7 (22.6)

   

Minimally better

35 (19)

21.2 (18.6)

6.1 (5.5)

0.42 (0.24)

4.7 (4.1)

No change

38 (21)

15.1 (14.5)

   

Minimally worse

22 (13)

10.8 (18.0)

   

Much worse

20 (12)

5.6 (20.4)

   

FACT-Cog PCI

T2, FACT-G

ρ = −0.34

 

Much better

73 (38)

−16.5 (14.8)

   

Minimally better

27 (14)

−11.0 (14.5)

   

No change

43 (22)

−5.3 (10.6)

6.3 (4.4)

0.32 (0.30)

6.6 (6.1)

Minimally worse

26 (14)

−10.5 (10.6)

   

Much worse

13 (7)

−18.0 (14.3)

   

T3, FACT-G

ρ = −0.38

 

Much better

57 (31)

−18.0 (14.4)

   

Minimally better

35 (19)

−13.5 (11.7)

   

No change

38 (21)

−10.4 (9.1)

3.1 (3.1)

0.21 (0.21)

4.4 (4.4)

Minimally worse

22 (13)

−8.3 (12.1)

   

Much worse

20 (12)

−5.1 (12.0)

   
  1. aChange in FACT-G < −7 (much worse), −7 to −4 (minimally worse), −3 to 3 (no change), 4 to 7 (minimally better), and > 7 (much better)
  2. b|Anchor min better – anchor no change| in mean change in FACT-Cog