Skip to main content

Table 2 Catalog of potential items to include when reporting GAS implementation details

From: A systematic review of goal attainment scaling implementation practices by caregivers in randomized controlled trials

Activity

GAS assessment

Potential GAS methods reported

Attribute reported

Yes/No/NAb

Goal setting

Personnel involved in goal setting

Patient

 

Clinician

 

Caregiver

 

Other

 

Personnel involved in assessing goal attainment

Patient

 

Clinician

 

Caregiver

 

Other (e.g. independent rater)

 

Number of goals set

Mean number of goals in each group

 

Range of goals

 

Time spent setting goals

 

Weighting of goals

By importance

 

By difficulty

 

Other weighting criteria, specify

 

Quality assurance

Number of GAS levels set

 

Baseline level specified

 

Blinding to other test scores

 

aUse of goal menu or inventory

 

Goal quality assessment performed

 

Training of GAS interviewers/raters

Name of training program

 

Brief description of training

 

Duration of training

 

Number of GAS interviews completed

Total number of interviews

 

Number of interviews by group (if multiple groups)

 

Analysis of GAS data

Calculation of GAS score

Raw score

 

T-score (T-score and standard deviation for each group)

 

Treatment effect size

Mean change scores (within and between groups)

 

Standard deviation of baseline and change scores

 

aCohen’s d/Hedge’s g

 

aStandardized response mean

 

Other information

aExample of one goal or goal areas

 

aUse of parametric or non-parametric tests

 
  1. aDenotes optional, but useful information to include in GAS studies. When included the researchers should provide sufficient details on the construction (e.g. patient/caregiver/clinician interviews, literature review) and application of the inventory (e.g. were subjects able to set goals that were not on the menu)
  2. bNot applicable