Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies (n = 33)

From: Use of patient-reported outcome measures after breast reconstruction in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Author, year

Study aims

Sample size

Mean/median age

Majority with high school education

Study setting

Study type

Level of evidence

AbuElnga 2021 [21]

Assess oncologic safety and cosmetic outcomes of extreme oncoplastic therapeutic mammoplasty among patients initially scheduled for mastectomy

36

48.5

Unspecified

Urban

Prospective cohort study

2

Aguiar 2017 [22]

Assess patient-reported outcomes measured by BREAST-Q after implant-based breast reconstruction

114

43

Yes

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Archangelo 2019 [23]

Evaluate sexual function, body image, and depression after postmastectomy breast reconstruction

90

48

Unspecified

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Athamnah 2021 [24]

Determine clinical outcome, patient satisfaction, and cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy

4

30

Unspecified

Urban

Prospective cohort study

2

Chang 2007 [25]

Examine health-related quality of life and attitudes toward breast surgery among breast cancer patients

235

49

Unspecified

Mixed

Cross-sectional study

3

Cortes-Flores 2014 [26]

Determine quality of life among patients treated with one of three different types of surgery for breast cancer

139

48.7

Unspecified

Unspecified

Cross-sectional study

3

Cortes-Flores 2017 [27]

Evaluate and compare the sexuality of women who underwent conservative mastectomy, mastectomy alone, and those who had breast reconstruction after cancer treatment

74

45

Unspecified

Unspecified

Cross-sectional study

3

Denewer 2012 [28]

Evaluate whether immediate autologous breast reconstruction influences QOL and patient satisfaction outcomes among women with breast cancer in comparison to the traditional mastectomy

200

39 (group 1, w/ recon), 51.5 (group 2, no recon)

Unspecified

Urban

Prospective cohort study

2

Fontes 2019 [29]

Assess the influence of different surgical treatment modalities on the level of physical activity, functional capacity, and quality of life of breast cancer survivors

180

Median BR group: 52

Yes

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Fung 2001 [30]

Investigate the effects that different types of breast surgery have on the quality of life of Chinese women

49

44.2

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Hashem 2017 [31]

Compare cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction between batwing mammoplasty and Wise pattern mammoplasty

126

44 (Wise pattern mammoplasty), 47 (Batwing mammoplasty)

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

He 2017 [32]

Identify associations between radiation, surgery timing relative to radiation, and autologous breast reconstruction

360

42

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

He 2019 [33]

Investigate the aesthetic outcomes within implant-based breast reconstruction patients who underwent a novel selection method

135

38.9 ± 8.3 years

Unspecified

Unspecified

Retrospective cohort study

3

He 2021 [34]

Investigate the oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction, and to compare the survival and surgical outcomes between implant-based and autologous reconstruction

124

38.4 (implant group), 41.7 (autologous group)

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Koppiker 2019 [35]

Investigate post-surgery complications after 1 year in patients who have undergone IBRS-ALDS (autologous lower dermal sling) and RT (radiation therapy)

78

Group A mean = 49.5, Group B mean = 47.2

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Kovacevic 2020 [36]

Determine the relationship between the levels of perceived quality of life in patients operated on for breast cancer in relation to the type of surgery, using the standardized questionnaires

425

58

Yes

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Li 2021 [37]

Evaluate the feasibility, complications, and cosmetic outcomes of immediate autologous fat grafting during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in Chinese patients with early-stage breast cancer

58

45

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Liu 2021 [38]

Examine the feasibility of mastoscopic modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with skin nipple-areola preservation under air cavity-free suspension hook and stage I silicone prosthesis implantation (SMALND) compared with routine MRM

87

43.7

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Macedo 2018 [39]

Evaluate sexual dysfunction among breast cancer patients with mastectomy, with or without breast reconstruction

28

53.77

Unspecified

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Manganiello 2011 [40]

Evaluate the sexual functioning of breast cancer patients post mastectomy and its association with their quality of life

100

Unspecified

Unspecified

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Medina-Franco 2010 [41]

Compare patient-reported body image and quality of life by breast surgery type

202

54

No

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Noyan 2006 [42]

Assess patient satisfaction by breast surgery type

125

41

No

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Ortega 2018 [43]

Assess work ability and productivity after breast surgery among breast cancer patients

152

47.5–50.1, based on group

Yes

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Ou 2015 [44]

Examine oncological and cosmetic outcomes in Asian women who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy in Taiwan

42

45.2

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Ozturk 2016 [45]

Identify differences in sexual function between postmastectomy breast reconstruction and breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy alone

100

47

Unspecified

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Paulinelli 2021 [46]

Evaluate the results of a cohort of patients submitted to a new technique of oncoplastic mammoplasty, referred to as Disguised Geometric Compensation Mammoplasty

25

47

Unspecified

Urban

Prospective cohort study

2

Shi 2011 [47]

Examine changes in long-term patient responses and predictors of quality of life outcomes after breast surgery

132

47.70 to 53.84, based on group

Unspecified

Unspecified

Prospective cohort study

2

Sinaei 2017 [48]

Examine quality of life among breast cancer patients with breast reconstruction

146

48.21

Yes

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Srimontayamas 2017 [49]

Examine long-term effects of different surgical treatments on QoL in Thai women with breast cancer

265

Mastectomy group: 49, BCT group: 47, Mastectomy-TRAM: 44

Yes

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Wang 2022 [50]

Determine incidence of chronic post-surgical pain after single-stage implant-based breast reconstruction

159

40.94

Unspecified

Urban

Retrospective cohort study

3

Yang 2015 [51]

Measure patient satisfaction by breast reconstruction type

285

Unspecified

Yes

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3

Zhang 2015 [52]

Evaluate associations between psychological functioning and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction

264

44.7

Yes

Urban

Prospective cohort study

2

Zhuang 2022 [53]

Assess decisional conflict, decision regret, self-stigma, and quality of life by breast surgery type

469

46.15

Yes

Urban

Cross-sectional study

3